Evidence dossier · Footwear & Entry Hygiene

How to clean shoe soles at the entrance: methods and limits

Cleaning shoe soles can mean very different things: removing mud, intercepting dust, drying moisture or attempting decontamination. Separating those goals prevents one method from being credited with results it has not demonstrated.

Soil and small debris can remain in shoe tread.
Soil and small debris can remain in shoe tread.
Why it matters

Brushing, matting, rinsing and active systems work in different ways. The 2016 review did not identify a consistently effective shoe-sole disinfection strategy in the included studies.

EVALUATION PATHFrom context to decision
01Outdoors

Soles contact changing surfaces and conditions.

02Footwear

Tread, moisture and attached material change the load.

03Entrance

The threshold can intercept before wider spread.

04Indoors

Behaviour and maintenance complete the strategy.

First question: what are you trying to remove?

Mud and coarse particles require mechanical action; water requires absorption or drying; microbial reduction is a different objective that needs specific validation.

Mats and abrasive surfaces

They are passive, simple and useful against part of the attached dirt. Performance depends on length, material, number of steps and maintenance.

Manual sole cleaning

Brushes, cloths or washing can remove visible material but add time, water management and drying. Results also depend on tread geometry.

Decontamination: what evidence is needed

The 2016 review assessed multiple strategies but did not identify a consistently effective method for disinfecting shoe soles. Any system claiming microbiological performance should demonstrate it under appropriate protocols.

Toward dedicated entry systems

The design question becomes: how can sole treatment be made fast, repeatable and compatible with the normal act of entering? That is the question HYGEN KLINX is evaluating during development.

Different methods, different outcomes

Brushing, wiping, rinsing and walk-off systems work in different ways. Removing visible mud or particles is not the same as disinfection; reducing moisture is not the same as lowering microbial load. Each method should therefore be assessed against the outcome it actually claims.

Why validation matters

The 2016 systematic review did not identify a consistently effective decontamination strategy in the included studies. Assessing a microbiological effect requires a protocol, target organisms, test conditions and repeatability. These data allow methods to be compared against the outcome actually observed.

Sources & evidence

  1. Shoe soles as a potential vector for pathogen transmission: a systematic review
  2. US EPA — Controlling Pollutants and Sources: Entry Mat Barriers
Choose a method for what needs removing: mud, particles, water or a contaminant requiring specific tests.