Dog paws and shoes — C. difficile household dissemination
Household study of paws and shoes; useful for transfer questions, not for estimating universal risk.
EVIDENCE AND CRITERIA
Scientific sources, standards and guidance cited in HYGEN KLINX insights.
Studies on paws and soles, indoor contaminants and entrance design requirements. Each reference identifies the topic studied and the setting to which it applies.
Household study of paws and shoes; useful for transfer questions, not for estimating universal risk.
Pilot study supporting caution: in that sample, paws were generally less contaminated than shoe soles.
Practical guidance on paw care and animal-appropriate cleaning.
Veterinary guidance on road salt, de-icers and residue removal.
Urine from infected animals can contaminate water and soil with Leptospira. The source describes that setting and does not establish household infection through soles or paws.
Longitudinal study of families introducing a dog and changes in house-dust microbiota.
Comparison of dog and non-dog homes across Finnish and German cohorts, with differences mainly in bacterial communities.
Study of associations between dog-related microbial signals and selected child health outcomes.
Measures urinary 2,4-D after potential exposure to treated lawns; documents exposure, not a clinical outcome.
Measures dislodgeable grass residues and multiple herbicides in dog urine after household lawn applications.
Review of organisms on shoe soles and decontamination strategies; no consistently effective method was identified in the studies included in 2016.
Evidence mainly from healthcare/controlled settings: useful for dissemination potential, not automatically transferable to homes.
Study of shoe-sole dust contribution to the airborne microbiome in its experimental setting.
General context on indoor microbial flows and multiple environmental sources.
A 2001 study of 11 occupied and two unoccupied homes after lawn applications. Documents indoor residue and the role of footwear and animals under those conditions.
A 2020 study in COVID-19 wards: PCR detection of genetic material, including on soles. Does not measure infectious virus or establish household infection through footwear.
Identifies contaminated soil and dust tracked in from outdoors among possible sources of indoor residue. Does not attribute every household contaminant to footwear.
Comparative study of flooring, humidity, surface dust loading and particle size.
Experiments on dry and wet soil deposition from footwear to indoor hard flooring and spread after repeated tracking.
Study of sources and pathways for arsenic, chromium, copper, manganese, lead and zinc in Sydney homes.
Overview of indoor pesticide sources, including contaminated soil or dust that can be tracked indoors.
Describes sources of indoor dust, resuspension and differences in exposure between children and adults.
Detects pollen allergens in indoor dust and identifies footwear and clothing as possible transport routes.
Experiments measuring particle pickup and release during foot traffic.
Framework separating soil track-in, outdoor-air infiltration and organic matter in indoor dust.
Shows how rapidly mineral particles can be replaced during successive steps.
Requires permanent entryway systems at least 10 ft / 3 m long to capture dirt and particulates in applicable projects.
Historical WELL v1 reference for entrance pollutant control; the page is a legacy standard version.
Design guidance on entry mat barriers and controlling pollutants and dirt tracked indoors.
Context for multifamily entrances and management of tracked-in material.
Healthcare study in which the contamination peak moved with the footwear-change zone.