Design framework · Building Entry Hygiene

An entrance is not just a door: it is a control zone

Building design already treats the entrance as a control point for soil, particulates and moisture carried in from outdoors. LEED, WELL v1 and EPA guidance all reflect this through walk-off systems and entry barriers. That context does not validate HYGEN KLINX, but it does define a real, established problem from which new solutions can be evaluated.

A shared entrance connects outdoor routes with the building interior.
A shared entrance connects outdoor routes with the building interior.
Why this matters

The threshold concentrates the transition from outdoors to indoors. Existing systems mainly aim to capture soil, particulates and moisture before they spread through the building; HYGEN KLINX explores an additional layer — dedicated treatment at the point of entry — which must be validated separately.

EVALUATION PATHThe entrance as a system
01Outdoors

People and footwear arrive under variable environmental conditions.

02Entryway

Grilles and walk-off systems intercept some dirt and moisture.

03Management

Sizing, maintenance and traffic flows determine effectiveness.

04Evolution

Dedicated treatment needs specific validation and design integration.

The entrance is already treated as a control zone

LEED v4.1 and WELL v1 include entry walk-off systems designed to capture particulates from footwear; their requirements specify systems extending about 3 metres in the primary direction of travel. EPA also recommends properly designed and maintained entry systems to trap soil, pollutants and moisture before they spread further indoors.

What existing systems do — and do not do

Grilles, mats and walk-off systems work mainly through mechanical capture, scraping and absorption. They are tools for managing soil, particulates and moisture, not systems for disinfecting shoe soles. That distinction matters because established building practices should not be confused with antimicrobial performance claims that require dedicated evidence.

From passive control to dedicated treatment

The next question is not simply how to build a better mat, but whether the threshold can become a functional layer integrating capture, moisture management, maintenance and — when technically validated — direct treatment of surfaces entering the building. Here, Building Entry Hygiene refers to evaluating these functions together.

Hospitality, residential and workplace are different problems

Hospitality prioritises guest flow, experience and aesthetic integration; premium residential settings value discretion, ease of use and simple maintenance; workplaces add capacity, reliability and operating cost. A Building solution therefore needs to be designed and measured as infrastructure, not as a scaled-up consumer product.

Certification and project requirements

LEED v4.1, WELL v1 and EPA provide references for managing soil, particulates and moisture at entrances. HYGEN KLINX is in development and has no LEED or WELL v1 certification. Compliance and contributions to specific credits require assessment of the actual system and the project in which it will be integrated.

Integrating hygiene into entrance design

The useful principle is simple: manage part of the outdoor load at the point where it enters, rather than acting only after it has dispersed. Turning that principle into genuine hygiene infrastructure still requires data, testing, defined maintenance and design integration. This is the design context in which HYGEN KLINX is developing.

Sources & evidence

  1. USGBC LEED v4.1 — Enhanced IAQ Strategies: Entryway Systems
  2. US EPA — Entry Mat Barriers
  3. WELL v1 — Healthy Entrance
Assess entrance systems, routes, dimensions and maintenance against the building’s operating conditions.